Lloyds TSB and C&G abandon the Bank Rate cap on their SVR - Ray Boulger

Posted on 27 May 2010 by Ray Boulger

1 comment(s)


Lloyds Banking Group has just announced that from 1 June Lloyds TSB, Lloyds TSB Scotland and Cheltenham & Gloucester will abandon their current SVR structure, i.e. a guaranteed lifetime cap at Bank Rate + 2%, and instead all new mortgages, including product transfers, will revert to a new managed rate with no guarantees. This will be called the “Homeowner Variable Rate,” and the rate is initially set at 3.99%.

As the shortest initial period for the initial rates on any of the Lloyds TSB or Cheltenham & Gloucester mortgages is 2 years no borrower will pay this new 3.99% SVR for at least 2 years, which also means that the rate is completely academic for the next 2 years, although of course a rate has to be quoted in Key Facts Illustrations, and Lloyds Banking Group is clearly indicating where they would set the rate in today’s market conditions.

Lloyds TSB and C&G have also advised that from 1 June they will reduce the rates on most products if taken out on a repayment basis by around 0.1%, but will increase them by 0.1% for interest only mortgages as they are copying Halifax and some other lenders by introducing a 0.2% premium for interest only.

This policy change on SVR exactly mirrors what Nationwide did a year ago, even to the extent of the new rate being set at the same level of 3.99%. Nationwide had exactly the same problem as Lloyds TSB in having a contractual commitment in their mortgage offers that its SVR would not exceed 2% above Bank Rate. There was no way out of this commitment and so the only solution for it was to introduce a new SVR for new mortgages, and

Existing borrowers will not be affected unless they switch to new deal by doing a product transfer. Lloyds TSB, C&G and Nationwide borrowers who wish to remain on a variable rate, which for the time being seems sensible for most people, would be mad to opt out of a lifetime tracker capped at 2% above Bank Rate with no early repayment changes. However, if they want to consider switching to a fixed rate they will need to take into account that they are permanently giving up this very good long term capped tracker rate. This is particularly relevant for anyone with less than 25% equity in their property.

In its press release Lloyds TSB has included a comparison table purporting to show the reversionary rates of the other major lenders. I am always very cynical of comparison tables produced by lenders and this table fully justifies that cynicism on two counts. The table leaves out the 3.5% reversionary rate of the largest lender (Halifax) and the Barclays/Woolwich reversionary rate is actually 2.49% (Bank Rate + 1.99%), not the 4.99% conveniently used in the table. Whilst 4.99% is Woolwich’s SVR this is now only used for further advances and the flexible element of its Open Plan mortgages and the Lloyds press release specifically refers to reversionary rates.

If one recalculates the average reversionary rate of the top 8 lenders, substituting the correct rate for Woolwich and including the Halifax rate, the average comes out at 3.99%! As a result the claim in the last paragraph of the press release that the new 3.99% rate is below the average of other major lenders is inaccurate, although it would of course be fair to say it is in line with the average of other rates.

I can completely understand the commercial pressures that have pushed Lloyds Banking Group down this road but it does remove one of Lloyds TSB's USPs and means that new customers will get a less good deal, particularly those on a relatively high loan to value taking a 2 year deal.

Categories: Bank of England, Mortgages, Interest rates

Comments

Ray,

I appreciate your comments insights on BBC News and on this blog.

Do you (and your readers) think this indicates that Lloyds believes the Bank Of England will leave interest rates super-low for the forseeable future ? I'm on a C&G lifetime tracker 1.6% above base and (obvsiously) very happy with it but am thinking of selling up. If rates are going to stay low it's almost worth just holding on.

Do you think government will use other tools (VAT increase, NI increase, public sector wage stagnation etc) to keep inflation down rather than the (independent, of course :) B of E upping rates and hitting the over-stretched mortgage owners ?

Could we or even the Western world be 'doing a Japan' and on the way to low rates almost ad infinitum ?

Regards, Tim

Tim28/05/2010 13:25

Post a Comment

Please keep your comments relevant. Charcol reserves the right to edit or delete comments.

The blog postings on this site solely reflect the personal views of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views, positions, strategies or opinions of John Charcol. All comments are made in good faith, and John Charcol will not accept liability for them. We may contact you in response to your comment – by submitting your comment, you are consenting to this.

To find out more about how we collect, use and protect your data, please read our privacy policy.

You are currently offline. Some pages or content may fail to load.